Latest insights, firm news and podcasts Carpmaels in Conversation: Ep.34 – The patent landscape in battery technologyEpisode overviewRead More 17Sep2024 Hand Held Products, inc. v Scandit AG: The UPC gets (in)directly to the pointDirect and indirect infringement at the UPCRead More 13Sep2024 How many use claims does it take to protect a functional food?Therapeutic vs non-therapeutic use claims for functional foodsRead More 12Sep2024 Amendments at the UPC – what to consider?The UPC’s guidance so far on amendments to the patent and amendments to the caseRead More 28Aug2024 UPC Court of Appeal issues Order in the case of Neo Wireless GmbH & Co KG v Toyota Motor Europe NV/SACourt of Appeal confirms the importance of implementing a co-ordinated strategy for opt-outsRead More 22Aug2024 What does it take to be an “active ingredient”?CJEU called upon to rule on Articles 1(b) and 3(a) for Halozyme’s SPC application for Herceptin SC (C-456/24)Read More 21Aug2024 Who’s Who Legal IP: 2024 rankingsWho’s Who Legal (WWL) have recently published their WWL IP: 2024 report in which members of the team at Carpmaels & Ransford have been selected as some of the world’s leading practitionersRead More 21Aug2024 UPC asserts its jurisdiction in parallel patent proceedings in Mala v Nokia disputeThe team are covering an order which saw the Paris Central Division foraying into the wonderful world of EU regulations, namely Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 (recast), to determine whether it had jurisdiction when there were parallel German proceedings pending for the same patentRead More 19Aug2024 UPC Court of Appeal demonstrates (surprising) flexibility in order on appeal timelinesThe Court of Appeal (CoA) found the appeal grounds filed by AIM within 2 months (instead of the 15 days prescribed by the Rules of Procedure) were admissible, considering an ambiguity in the Rules of Procedure and (incorrect/incomplete) information provided by the Court of First Instance (CFI)Read More 19Aug2024 Revisiting lessons from the first ex parte UPC preliminary injunction in myStromer v RevoltThe team visit the Düsseldorf Local Division last year in two decisions (22 June and 18 October) in Mystromer v. Revolt Zycling, UPC_CFI_177/2023Read More 19Aug2024<1…567891011…68> Type Firm News Insights PodcastsServiceProtectDealDisputeSectorHealthcare+Energy+Life SciencesChemistryMaterialsEngineeringTechCreativeArchive2025JulyJuneAprilMarchFebruaryJanuary2024DecemberNovemberOctoberSeptemberAugustJulyJuneMayAprilMarchFebruaryJanuary2023DecemberNovemberOctoberSeptemberAugustJulyJuneMayAprilMarchFebruaryJanuary2022DecemberNovemberOctoberSeptemberAugustJulyJuneMayAprilMarchFebruaryJanuary2021DecemberNovemberOctoberSeptemberAugustJulyJuneMayAprilMarchFebruaryJanuary2020DecemberNovemberOctoberSeptemberAugustJulyJuneMayAprilMarchFebruaryJanuary2019DecemberNovemberOctoberSeptemberAugustJulyJuneMayAprilMarchFebruaryJanuary2018DecemberNovemberOctoberSeptemberAugustJulyJuneMayAprilMarchFebruaryJanuary2017DecemberNovemberOctoberSeptemberAugustJulyJuneMayAprilMarchFebruaryJanuary2016DecemberNovemberOctoberSeptemberAugustJulyJuneMayAprilMarchFebruaryJanuary2015DecemberNovemberOctoberSeptemberAugustJulyJuneMayAprilMarchFebruaryJanuary2014DecemberNovemberOctoberAugustJulyJuneMayAprilMarchFebruaryJanuary2013DecemberNovemberOctoberSeptemberAugustJulyJuneMayAprilMarchJanuary2012NovemberJulyJuneMayAprilFebruaryJanuary
